Feeds:
Posts
Comments

written by Shayan Khan

Pakistan and India are in a region of not only high population, but one of high population growth – a region where both economies rely heavily on rain fed crop land. With the two countries going to war three times in the last sixty years and found ever-ready to start a fourth one, availability of water to both nations is of utmost important for the stability of the entire region.

In recent weeks, the importance of availability of water was brushed aside with the overhyped claims that IPCC report was wrong to conclude that Himalayan Glaciers would disappear in few decades. Under the noise of “crying foul” the most important aspect of regular availability of water to the region now seems to be lost. Currently, the broad consensus is that the glaciers themselves are indeed retreating, although the rate of the recession may be debatable. However, there are other climate-influenced factors that affect river flows, such as changes in precipitation, snowfall and regional temperature.

“There has been too much focus on glaciers whereas there are other factors like precipitation and snowfall that affect the levels of waters in rivers downstream from the eastern Himalayas,” says Mats Eriksson, a senior hydrologist with the Nepal-based International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), which has carried out several studies on the glaciers in the Hindu Kush Himalayas.

The Himalayan water system can be divided into two, Eastern and Western, based on the sources for river flow resources. Eastern system feeds India, Bangladesh, while Western System feeds India and Pakistan.

Eastern Himalayas

Eastern Himalayas feed major rivers like the Ganges and the Bramhaputra, as well as their tributaries. These are vital lifelines for billions of people in India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and Tibet.

A recent study for the World Bank has shown that the volume of water resulting from glacial melt in Nepal makes up less than 5% of the flows of rivers leaving the country and contributing to the Ganges downstream.

“That is, about 95% or more of the river flow is the result of rain and melting seasonal snow,” said report co-author Richard Armstrong, a glaciologist from the University of Colorado at Boulder, US.
If that is true, rivers downstream of the eastern Himalayas will hardly be affected, even if the glaciers recede or disappear. Additionally other contributing factors to the rivers’ flow, such as precipitation and snowfall will also change with the changing climate leading to rise or fall of rivers’ levels – and by how much and when – are the questions still waiting to be answered.
“We are seeing some changes in the monsoon,” Dr Eriksson said of the seasonal precipitation system that shapes the climate in this part of the region.

“Last year, for example, the monsoon arrived one month late in Nepal and then some places saw 80mm of water in a day during the delayed rainy season.

“But there has been no consistent measurement of precipitation and temperature and there is a lack of proper studies.”

Some scientists believe absorption of solar radiation by aerosols (dust particles and carbon soot) can heat the atmosphere and accelerate regional impacts of global warming, which in turn affect water resources.

William Lau, who heads the atmospheric sciences branch at Nasa’s Goddard Flight Center, carried out a study in India last year and found that, as a result of aerosols, regional temperature was rising much faster than expected. And that, he said, could influence the monsoon systems, resulting in less water availability in the region.

Dr Richard Armstrong on the other hand said that a warming climate could also mean a stronger monsoon bringing more precipitation that could increase stream flows.

“Having said that, it should be noted that future precipitation patterns predicted by climate models are highly variable and there is a very little regional agreement among the models,” he said.

Western Himalayas

High variability is also an issue with the flow of rivers in the western Himalayas that do not fall within the monsoon regime.

There is no clear-cut signal as there is a large variation between average annual flows,” said Arshad Muhammad Khan, a physicist who heads the Global Change Impact Studies Centre in Pakistan.
“For example, in the Indus River, the maximum flow is twice of that of the minimum.”

Unlike the Ganges, rivers like the Indus in the western part of the Himalayas are heavily dependent on glaciers, as this region does not get monsoon rains.

But even here, glacial status is not reported to be uniform.  Some scientists say increasing temperature has meant that glaciers don’t get enough snowfall during winter and therefore river flow during summer is dwindling.

“We have seen the decline in the flow of the Indus, Chenab and Jhelum rivers,” says Professor Mohammad Sultan Bhat of Kashmir University, who has conducted field studies with India’s flood and irrigation department.

“We have recorded a decrease of 40% in the flow of Jhelum’s tributary river… that is fed by the receding Kolahi glacier.”

But, Kenneth Hewitt, a glaciologist from Canada who has been doing field studies in Pakistan’s Karakoram mountains, told BBC News last October that he had seen at least half a dozen glaciers there advancing since he saw them five years ago.

With glaciers offering such complex pictures, combined with precipitation and temperature patterns becoming increasingly complicated, the region’s river systems that depend on all these factors cannot be simpler.

Water Sharing between India and Pakistan

Under the treaty signed in 1960, Pakistan and India share five tributaries of the Indus River, namely, Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Beas and Sutlej. The agreement grants Pakistan exclusive rights over waters from the Indus and its westward-flowing tributaries, the Jhelum and Chenab, while the Ravi, Beas and Sutlej rivers were allocated for India’s use.

However, if any one of the two finds itself short of the vital necessarily the transboundary water sharing between India and Pakistan will become an extremely difficult proposition. Unless both countries take preventive measures, the two might find each other at loggerheads and consequently arms pointed for access to this soon-to-be ultimate precious resource.

Water Dispute – the New Reason for Indo-Pak War

All three wars between the two brith-rivals have been over land disputes. However, if the changes in water availability continue, land would take the second priority, getting superseded by water. Even the anti-war liberals would find themselves out of choices and audience in such a scenario. Unless immediate measures are taken to mitigate the future water scarcity, the world might find two heavily armed, nuclear neighbour going at each other’s throats.

written by Shayan Khan

Water is essential for life and this is nowhere more so understandable than the region of South Asia where the entire economies depend on river waters. A year which sees decline in river flow consequently results in decline in the overall crop output, resultantly in lower economic activity. This region heavily relies on glacier waters and tethers on edge with regard to the distribution of water between bordering countries, especially Pakistan and India. It is now a yearly routine when both countries accuse each other of stealing water – not literally – but by building dams on rivers which flow through the two countries, thereby denying the other of much needed water. However, this has not resulted into any significant incident, yet, as there has never been such a severe reduction in the amounts of water that a country’s agricultural system collapses. But these highly public verbal ultimatums might not be the final limits anymore, if the latest findings of scientists are correct.

Pakistan and India have long been embroiled in border and water disputs, but have so far managed to uphold a World Bank-mediated Indus Water Treaty (IWT) that provides mechanisms for resolving disputes over water sharing. But this treaty has been upheld for the main reason that no country faced a severe shortage of water in the past 60 years. And all this is about to change.
Based on scientific findings released last December, the snow cover in Himalayan Region is declining while temperature is rising. The findings were the results of a study conducted by senior scientist H. S. Negi and his colleagues, and were published in the ‘Journal of Earth System Sciences’, a bimonthly science publication in India.  The study was carried out on the Kashmir region of Himalayan range.

The findings were based on 20 years worth of climatic condition data, covering the periods 1988-89 and 2007-08, and was undertaken during the winter periods between November and April of 2004–05, 2005–06 and 2006–07, using multi-temporal sensor data.

“Snow cover monitoring was carried out to evaluate the region-wise accumulation and ablation pattern of snow cover in the Pir Panjal and Shamshawari ranges of Kashmir valley,” said Negi. “The study shows reduction in the areal extent of seasonal snow cover and rising trend of maximum temperature in three winters for the entire Kashmir valley.”

Negi and his team found that the total snowfall in the winter of 2004-05 was 1,082 centimetres across the valley, which declined to 968 centimetres during the period 2005-06 and reduced further to 961 centimetres between 2006 and 2007.

“February, the second month of maximum snowfall, showed rapid fluctuation, with 585 centimetres in 2004-05 compared to 207 centimetres in 2005-06 and 221 centimetres in 2006-07,” said the scientists, adding that the temperatures remained more than zero degree Celsius during winters, except for January-February 2004-05 and January 2006 against a normal sub-zero temperature.
Unlike the Eastern Himalayan rivers such as the Brahmaputra, which are mainly rain-fed, most of the water that goes to the Indus river comes from snowmelt, which includes glacial melt. Global warming-induced changes in climate patterns have adversely affected, among others, snowmelt runoff patterns.

“The Indus water system is the lifeline for Pakistan, as 75 to 80 percent of water flows to Pakistan as melt from the Himalayan glaciers. This glacier melt forms the backbone of irrigation network in Pakistan, with 90 percent of agricultural land being fed by the vastly spread irrigation network in Pakistan, one of the largest in the world,” said Dr Irshad Muhammad Khan, executive director of Global Change Impacts Studies Centre in Pakistan. Any disruption of water flow would cause a grave impact on agriculture produce in Pakistan, he said.

“Until now, the Indus Water Treaty has worked well, but the impact of climate change would test the sanctity of this treaty,” Dr Parvez Amir, a senior economist, warned.

Under the treaty signed in 1960, the two countries also share five tributaries of the Indus river, namely, Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Beas and Sutlej. The agreement grants Pakistan exclusive rights over waters from the Indus and its westward-flowing tributaries, the Jhelum and Chenab, while the Ravi, Beas and Sutlej rivers were allocated for India’s use.

“I think it is not only the matter of Indus water treaty between India and Pakistan but also the water-sharing treaties elsewhere in the world such as those in the Middle East that also face a severe threat in the form of climate change,” said Dr Amir.

According to Prof. Mohammad Sultan, who teaches Geography at Kashmir University, temperature in the region has shown disturbing trends over the last few decades. “From 1950 to 1975, the temperature had shown a cooling trend (0.2 below normal). But after 1975 there has been a warming trend (0.4 degree above normal), and it is continuing,” he said.

He said precipitation in the lower parts of Kashmir has declined by 1.2 centimetres in lower altitudes and 8 cm in higher altitudes beginning in 1975. “This disturbance is bound to impact the accessibility to water in the future,” he said.

Transboundary water sharing between India and Pakistan will become an “extremely difficult proposition as surface water would become a scarce commodity with the depletion of water reserves up in the mountains,” said Prof Sultan.

Unless both countries take preventive measures, the two might find each other at loggerheads and consequently arms pointed for access to this soon-to-be ultimate precious resource.

written by Hammad Nawaz

Powers to be have chalked out a simple yet VERY devastating plan for Pakistan for the coming years. Of course, their first choice is to have disposed off this country once and for all. However, in case this again proves difficult to achieve the other option is to put this country under so much debt that no matter how patriotic the next government is, it will have no choice but to do the bidding of “powers to be” just to keep the country’s economy at a functioning level. This is the reason international agencies are providing “aid” to Pakistan at such an unprecedented scale, something which wasn’t witnessed even under West’s best friend General Pervez Musharraf. With the economic and political turmoil and foreign debt this government will the country with, everyone can sleep easy that Pakistan will not be able to have any decisive authority for many years to come.

And this ends my five sentences.

taken from xavia

Dr. Igor Panarin in 1998 predicted that in 2010 USA will break into six different territories.

Panarin, a former KGB analyst who heads the Diplomacy Academy of the Russian foreign ministry, likened the current crisis in the United States to the last days of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), and said US President Barack Obama would be unable to stop his country’s economic meltdown and eventual “disintegration.”

Igor Panarin has this to say over his 1998 prediction, “I’ve studied the history of the United States and my conclusion is that it has no future … The fall of Wall Street last year could be likened to the end of the American Dream… Obama will not be able to do anything. He is like [the USSR’s last leader Mikhail] Gorbachev, who had beautiful words to say but when it came to work, it was a different matter. Obama is the American version of Gorbachev.”

The 6 Republics

Panarin, who predicted as early as 1998 that the United States would eventually collapse, said its disintegration would begin this autumn (2009) and last for nine months before six separate “republics” emerge to supplant it.

The new territories would include the “California Republic” (composed of the states of California, Washington, Oregon, Nevada, Arizona, Utah, and Idaho), which would be absorbed or fall under the influence of China, and the “Texas Republic” (Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, and Florida) that would become part of or fall under Mexico’s influence.

Canada would get or influence the “Central North American Republic” (the Midwest plus Montana, Wyoming and Colorado), “Atlantic America” (the northeastern American seaboard plus Kentucky, Tennessee, and North and South Carolina) would end up with the European Union or the United Kingdom.

And Alaska would revert back to Russia, and Japan and China would take over Hawaii.

Pyramid of debt

According to Panarin’s theory America’s collapse was being brought about by economic and political factors, particularly the fall of the US dollar and its burgeoning foreign debt. He said, “They have created in the United States a pyramid [of foreign debt] based on the dollar, and they see no other way to solve this crisis… In the 1980s, the US almost had no foreign debt, but in 1998, this reached $2 trillion. Now, they have [a debt of] $12 trillion and so it grew six times in just a decade… This reminds me of the situation in my country before the USSR fell because our foreign debt increased five times.”

US will not recover from the current economic crisis and the US greenback would go on a free fall this autumn and would be replaced by regional currencies for world trade to go on, thus triggering the unravelling of America.

Other signs of collapse

The other signs pointing to the collapse would be:

  • Number of US banks declaring bankruptcy – which had risen from just three in 2007 to 25 in 2008;
  • America’s shrinking gross domestic product, burgeoning budget deficit of more than $1 trillion, and the biggest unemployment figures “in the last 60 years.”
  • Eight US states had reiterated their sovereignty vis-à-vis the US federal government, seven of them just this February
  • Some native American groups had also declared their “independence” from the union.
  • Nawaz Sharif will grow more hair
  • Nawaz Sharif will cut a deal with Asif Ali Zardari. As a result Nawaz and Shahbaz Sharif will not take any pratical steps to undermine Zardari Government. Zardari in return will call for early elections.
  • MI6 will put its heart n soul in backing Nawaz Sharif.
  • MI6 will launch a world-wide media campaign with the aim to stop Musharraf from coming back to Pakistan to run for the office. MI-6 thinks Musharraf is the only person who can threaten Nawaz’s victory.
  • Musharraf will return to run for the office and Nawaz will start loosing his hair – again.

My Predictions for Mid-Term Elections

Signs of Mid-Term Elections

  • Ministers and political leaders of ruling PPP will start abandoning the party
  • There will be a backlash of Government’s move to give Balochistan more autonomy
  • Reports will come from India that Musharraf had planned for a comeback with the help of his appointed generals before leaving office and one of those generals is becoming the next COAS
  • Nawaz, Zardari and Chaudhries will join hands in their efforts to stop Musharraf from coming back to Pakistan
  • Altaf Hussain will first propose that Musharraf run for the office from his party ticket but when Musharraf starts his own party, he will also join forces against him

 Mid-Term Election Campaign

  • Musharraf will be backed by China and Saudi Arabia
  • Humayun Akhtar will try to pump his billions into Musharraf campaign (hoping to become next PM)
  • Chaudhries and Sharifs will join hands to fight the “evil” of Musharraf. Chief Justice (retd.) Iftikhar Chaudhry will also join politics
  • Aitzaz Ahsan will run from PPP platform for the seat of PM

Will Musharraf Win?

  • No. Unless he…

Politics

  • Germany will come out as a winner from the current economic crisis, which will also result in a global shifting of power
  • Russia will move towards forming a block with Germany

Finance

  • Google bubble will burst, for completely un-IT related reasons

IT and Internet

  • In next three/four years new players will emerge
  • Musharraf assassination plot
  • Musharraf entering politics
  • Humayun Akhtar will try to pump his personal billions into Musharraf campaign with the aim of becoming next PM
  • Nawaz, Zardari and Chaudhries will join with the aim of stopping Musharraf coming back to Pakistan
  • Pakistan will have another earthquake

My Predictions

  • Pakistan will have early elections
  • Musharraf will enter politics
  • Humayun Akhtar will try to put his personal billions of rupees into Musharraf’s campaign in a bid to become next PM
  • Zardari will not complete his term
  • Government will try to give Balochistan more autonomy, which will backfire
  • Raja Ashraf Pervez will not eliminate loadshedding by December 2009 (my favorite prediction)

Signs of Early Elections

  • One clear cut sign will be PPP ministers and politicians abandoning Zardari in a very similar fashion as it happened to Musharraf

PM Candidates in Next Elections

  • Humayun Akhtar
  • Aitzaz Ahsan
  • Nawaz Sharif
  • Yusuf Raza Gillani
  • Imran Khan

Presidential Candidates in Next Elections

  • Pervez Musharraf
  • Chief Justice (retd.) Iftikhar Chaudhry

International Involvement

  • Germany will be gain an influential hand in Pakistani politics – to the surprise of many, including US and Europe
  • Pakistan’s next elections would be truly Globalized elections with candidates backed by foreign governments, mainly EU, US/UK/India and China/Saudi Arabia (China and Saudi Arabia seperately would be backing the same candidate)

Afghanistan and Central Asia

  • Tired of continuous foreign involvement in Afghanistan, the next government will openly strive towards some sort of unification between Afghanistan, Pakistan and may be Central Asia
  • Against all odds, Karzai will find himself out of office

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.